Here's why Kylie Jenner's $800 million cosmetics empire could end up suffering the same fate as Martha Stewart's failed media company


  • Kylie Jenner’s cosmetic company, Kylie Cosmetics, has sold more than $630 million worth of makeup. Andreessen Horowitz partner Li Jin suggests that Jenner’s company is flawed.
  • According to Jin, Jenner relies too much on her own celebrity appeal to tout her brand.
  • An enduring business is tied to an idea or a larger purpose, not an individual, suggests Jin. 

At 20 years old, Kylie Jenner is poised to become the world’s youngest billionaire. Her hugely successful cosmetic company, Kylie Cosmetics, has crossed the $630 million sales mark since it was created in 2015. Is now worth close to $800 million.

Forbes, , described the 20-year-old’s company as a business model so efficient that it runs, essentially, on “air.”

The key to Kylie Cosmetics’. Recent success? Jenner’s expertly executed social media strategy: With hundreds of millions of online followers at her fingertips, Jenner can advertize and sell her products all without ever expending a dime of her own.

But for Li Jin, an investment partner at Silicon Valley venture firm Andreessen Horowitz, Jenner’s social media smarts mightn't be enough to leverage her brand into an enduring business.

[s]that there’s a cautionary tale at the heart of Jenner’s unprecedented success. That the 20-year-old’s cosmetic empire might be fated for obscurity unless she expands its focus.

Kylie Cosmetics

According to Jin, Kylie Cosmetics’. Primary flaw is that it’s too focused on Kylie Jenner. 

“The major job that her products help consumers do now is to feel like they’re accessing a piece of Kylie,”. Jin writes.

If Jenner hopes to maintain her business in the long-run, Jin suggests that it shouldn’t rely as much on Jenner’s celebrity persona: To become an enduring, standalone business, it’s necessary for all influencer brands to go beyond being tied to a single person. Create a ‘purpose brand.'”

Jin points to Harvard Business professor Clayton Christensen’s[it] as being a company that “become[s] so tightly associated with the job they perform that they become inextricably linked to it.”

For instance, enduring brands like Coca-Cola, Starbucks. Kleenex have all iterated their mission so well that consumers will pay a premium for their products over their more negligible counterparts. These brands aren’t linked to an individual, they’re connected to something much bigger: An idea, an emotion. A mission.

“Some of the strongest purpose brands even become verbs, inextricably linked with a specific job,”. Jin continued. “It’s tough for brands to stick around without being tied to a specific job. Consumers&rsquo. Jobs don’t often change.”

Could Kylie Jenner’s company suffer the same fate as Martha Stewart’s Omnimedia?

Martha Stewart

If Jenner doesn’t shift Kylie Cosmetics’. Focus beyond her own celebrity influencer appeal, Jin suggests that it could suffer the same fate as Martha Stewart’s media company, Living Omnimedia, which [to start]following its initial public offering in 1997. 

“In the ’90s, Stewart leveraged her prominence from books and TV to create a business with publishing, broadcasting. Merchandising segments, all centered around her persona as a homemaking goddess,”. Writes Jin. “Its valuation hit $1.8B after IPO. 16 years later, [it] was de-listed and worth a small fraction of that.”

While some might believe that social media provides powerful, enduring fuel for any celebrity or influencer-backed startup, Jin says that it’s just the opposite: In the digital age, celebrity-focused brands dissolve faster than ever before.

“In today’s digital world, with compressed hype cycles and without the benefit of multi-year retail or broadcasting contracts, celeb-underpinned brands can fade even faster,” . She writes. “Social media has made it easier than ever to attract an audience and build widespread influence…the barriers [to start] a new brand are lower than ever.”

Is social media really all you need to run an $800 million business if you’re an influential celebrity?

Forbes’. Story suggests that Jenner is almost entirely reliant on her social media following to turn a profit: “Basically, all Jenner does to make all that money is leverage her social media following,”. “Almost hourly, she takes to Instagram and Snapchat, pouting for selfies with captions about which Kylie Cosmetics shades she’s wearing, takes videos of forthcoming products and announces new launches.”

Is social media really all you need to run a billion dollar business if you’re an influential celebrity?

Jin doesn’t think so. After all, she writes, celebrity-backed brands like Blake Lively’s Preserve and Mary Kate and Ashley Olsens’. StyleMint have all petered out within the last few years. Successful celebrity-backed companies like Jessica Alba’s Honest Company and Gwyneth Paltrow’s Goop shifted the focus away from their starlet founders early on, says Jin.  

“Their famous names imparted a signal of credibility. To scale and endure, they aligned themselves with broader movements and communities,”. She writes. 

To create a long-lasting company, Jin recommends that Kylie Jenner transfer the focus of Kylie Cosmetics to a distinct, mission-oriented purpose: “She can align her brand with a broader shift in women’s attitudes: Today, that could be makeup as self-expression and a celebration of individuality and diversity.”

 

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: This conveyor belt can move in any direction





Source link

Shares
|ShareTweet

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*